CBT Solar Grant money HURTS Everyone

         
                     DISHONEST GRANT APPLICATIONS?

My history goes back to the Nelson Community Solar Garden a completely misrepresented deceptive political stunt.
It was presented as fully funded and voluntary, this didn't happen.

The public information was misrepresented, deceptive and changeable to suit the needs of the day, or public media item.

My issue is paying for something of no value,  So many costs are shown in the public information from $186,000 to $338,000, my estimate real cost was over $400,000.  

In a $60,000 grant request the city states the project will reduce GHG's, false.  Nothing is cleaner or greener than water power.
The grant shows a buy in forecast for participants as being from $2000 to $4000.  Their annual energy earned forecast exceeds years of known data by about 25%.  The city set the buy in at $923 per panel contract before final costs were known and this was never adjusted. Costs doubled.  The grant application states, any unforseen costs may affect the final cost to the customer.  

The project does adds to city GHG's, its not fully funded and all Nelson hydro customers are paying full retail for this while losing the income otherwise earned from cleaner greener water power.





Its time to stop these phony solar grant applications.  We are all in it together.  Until engineers stop lending their signatures to legitimize grants and educators begin to teach the real value of solar in BC the public money will continue to be wasted on solar projects in BC.

The Balfour Community Hall solar system will cost $5,448.00yr for 25 years to make power
valued at $28/yr.  See calculations at bottom.


The political feelgood agenda subsidizing solar projects at full retail are over.  Its not up to the single mom or other low incomers struggling to pay rent and feed their  families to subsidize these green washing projects.

Fortis, a business whose management answers to shareholders only pay wholesale for any excess solar power from anyone.  Also one cannot install a system larger than to meet their needs.

BC Hydro, politically driven no longer pays premium for any solar.  They now follow Fortis's lead.

Nelson has not caught up to reality, they pay full retail for their phony solar garden power and anyone else's solar power even though their bylaw says they won't buy any power unless it makes economic sense.  A subsidy from all Nelson hydro customers for fantasy solar that has no value here.




I believe I stopped one $60,000  CBT solar grant application. you can read about it below.

                                              First a brief educational piece

What could be more absurd than the only city with its own clean green hydro power plant making huge profits to put solar panels at the dam while sending water and profits down the river!  Plus increase the cities carbon footprint, nothing is cleaner or greener than our water power.

                              Almost all annual solar power is made when we can't even use all the water!

                                          Blue is water flowing through generators making power
Orange is water spilling from spring runoff till fall, the time 80% of annual solar power is earned.
Why is public grant money being used to put solar systems on public buildings whose only benefit is a small reduction in that buildings electric bill at huge cost to everyone else.  The Balfour community hall system I estimate annual costs at $5448 for solar valued at $28. (wholesale cost to produce that same power with our water power). In fact not even $28.  We all lose the income that water power would have made to help reduce all our electric bills.

            A local highway sign, showing local dams making power for a million homes, the solar garden in winter might make power for one home, $400,000.

Nelson dam overflowing from spring till fall while the community solar garden out of sight on the right makes power we don't need but spent over $400,000.   Nelson hydro customers subsidize this feel good worthless solar paying full retail so that money can be distributed to those who opted in for a 25 year contract for the power of a solar panel thinking they were saving the planet.

    Nelson dam in winter when Nelson buys most excess power from Fortis and solar doesn't work and every solar system installed with public money is cashing in their summer solar credits at full retail.

Nelson community solar garden in winter .  From October through March it makes enough power for little more than ONE average house.  $400,000.


//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

THREE BALFOUR  PUBLIC BUILDINGS HAVE SOLAR SYSTEMS FROM GRANT MONEY 

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////


The Balfour Golf Club house was one.

The RDCK engaged the Pembina Institute for their project.

CBT Grant eligibility requires

                 1 The project must demonstrate a positive return on investment
                 2 Have a significant community impact

Not Eligible if

                 1 Have a narrowly defined benefit
                 2 Are primarily focused on or associated with a single sport


                                  BALFOUR GOLF CLUB HOUSE SOLAR SYSTEM

            Solar Panels face East and West, solar panels make most power facing SOUTH

Nelson hydro's bylaw limits systems to 25 kW,  the golf clubhouse have 40 kW?

The losing bidder showed  24.8kW for the golf clubhouse, their bid statement

                    "in order to meet the Nelson hydro bylaw maximum of 25kW installed"

                   Why does the on line public data suggest only 24.8kW is installed?

UPDATE May 2021, I finally got this on line deception changed to show what is actually installed, over 40kW of solar.   Now any one using this data isn't fooled, this is the worst local system instead of the best.

The Community Hall continues the deception showing about 2/3 of what is actually installed.  How do I get this changed?  Everyone knows, I have told everyone over and over its deceptive.

From an RDCK agenda we have the following:

 One of the main stipulations is that projects cannot exceed 25 kW single-phase

 Why does the Golf Clubhouse have 40 kW installed?  The hydro manager answer, because they have two meters.  I don't want this man managing my electric utility!
   

From the RDCK Documents the following statement regarding solar

the systems must be economical to ensure public dollars are being spent prudently.


  Below from RDCK's own comments:

Each company provided an Internal Rate of Return (IRR) calculation, but the details of how each company performed the calculation is unknown. It is suspected the calculations are not similar and may or may not include levelized operation and maintenance costs.  This would be like buying a delivery truck for $100,000, gross earnings $10,000/yr and calling it a 10% return without including insurance, fuel, drivers wages, wear and tear, tires, all costs etc. .....Nonsense.

 The salespeople came up with positive economic returns of  +.5%  and -.4%?  This is eligible?  Golf is a single sport golf,  a single sport was ineligible for a grant!

  Calculations used the   IRR method of bookkeeping  and they exaggerated annual solar power beyond what years of  local data prove.  Also, that Nelson hydro would pay full retail for any excess solar power even though their bylaw says they won't buy any power unless it makes economic sense.

  Warren Buffet calls IRR bull@#$% bookkeeping.

Buffett: I’ve been on 19 boards and seen a zillion presentations projecting a certain IRR [internal rate of return]. If the boards had burned them all, they’d have been better off. The IRR is based on what the CEO wants. The numbers are made up.


Roof mounted solar panels require many roof mount penetrations, too risky to install on a metal roof.


                         The perfectly good Community Hall roof was replaced for $18,700

           After the Alberta bidders visit one finds the following in the  RDCK meeting minutes

 Balfour Recreation Commission for the Solar PV Systems Project be amended to include an additional $18,700 

 Below the new $18,700 roof more amenable to mounting solar panels without risk of roof leaks


             The roof faces West, solar panels make the most power facing south.


The National Fire Code requires one meter set back around the perimeter and a channel up the centre for fire fighting reasons.


One can find the community hall data here .  Nelson hydro has sold power to BC Hydro.
All 2019 Community Hall solar power made if sold to BC Hydro would earn less than $100.



                                               Below On Line info is DECEPTIVE

     

The on line public data is deceptive, anyone using this for their project calculations will be fooled into thinking the systems make more power than they actually do.  Why haven't they corrected this on line data I have brought it up more than once.
     

              One RDCK estimate shows the Alberta bidder installing for $2.68/watt.

             Travelling from Edmonton Alberta to install at this price?  Not believable.

                  The Nelson community solar garden was almost $7/watt installed.
                                    Kimberley SunMine almost $7/watt.
                               The Kelowna project estimated $4/watt.       It was never built the BCUC

 denied it because it was of no benefit to anyone and questionable whether any GHG's were saved.

Penticton was honest, their solar study said it would have to be subsidized over 50%.


The available public RDCK info regarding the solar projects and costs doesn't match
what has been installed.

Its reasonable and possibly optimistic to think they installed for $4/watt but lets use that.

3 systems total of 67 kW of solar installed at $4/watt + $18,700 roof totals $286,700.

                          25 year payback annual payments over $17,000/yr.

Total annual Balfour solar power from all three systems would be made by Nelson hydro for less than $500/yr and sold for a 1400% profit!


Its actually worse.

Since 80% of that annual solar power is earned when excess water is spilling over the dams, (see graph above in orange) one might attribute 20% of annual solar power to any value to society.

That works out to less than $100 solar value for $17,000 spent.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Remember the $60,000 in CBT grant money I believe I stopped.  Nelson applied for a $60,000 CBT grant for their solar garden but never received it.  I like to think it was because I was in touch with the CBT about that grant and their project.  Why is CBT still giving out grant money for solar projects?


The Posterchild of absurdity and public waste for solar
the Nelson Community Solar garden click here 



More dishonest grant applications click here 

As long as we have engineers willing to step on their professional ethics and sign their names to grants, and educators promoting solar this waste of public money won't end.

                     

Balfour Community Hall calculations:

18kW installed at $4/watt =$72,000 plus new roof $18,700 = Total $90700

Borrowed at 3.5%/yr for 25 years is annual payments of $5448.

One year of solar power 14270kWh made by Nelson hydro for .0087c/kWh wholesale =$124

Refer to Orange in river waterflow graph above showing water spilling from spring runoff
through fall, solar has NO value we don't even need the water.

Community Hall solar power made from Jan-Mar and Oct-Dec  total 3253kWh

3253kWh x .0087c/kWh(Nelson hydro wholesale) = $28.

$90,700 for a system one might attribute value to for $28!

This is undefendable, reality, the real cost to society.

Public money lost to legitimate grant applicants.

Nelson hydro customers subsidize this solar at full retail while losing income otherwise
earned from selling cleaner greener water power that would help keep everyone's electric
rates down.                       

Summerland Solar just one more example of misinformed and misguided public money wasted

This comes under the heading of we are all in it together.  All residents of BC are shareholders of BC Hydro whose legacy dams make power for 3.45c/kWh.

The Ken Davidson report "Zapped" tells the story of IPP waste caused by a previous government and policy that required BC Hydro to buy IPP power at full or more retail cost, particularly ROR (run of river) power that BC Hydro didn't need, it was all earned from spring runoff when every hydro reservoir and lake was overflowing and spilling.  Yet BCH was required to buy this ROR power at obscene full retail rates or more with inflation while spilling their legacy dam power made for around 3c/kWh.   These contracts will cost us billions in the next decades.


Summerland solar sold to the grid has the same value as the ROR IPP power, ZERO$$ and lost income from otherwise BCH legacy dam waterpower.

Balfour Solar Scam no. 2

PUBLIC GRANT MONEY CREATES DECEPTIVE PUBLIC INFORMATION!!!!!!

Same deception and waste occurrs with the Balfour golf clubhouse public data, all of this
I have presented to mayors, councilors, RDCK directors and others, the data is deceptive
it shows power made by the 40kW installed and yet shows 24.8kW installed.  Anyone reading
this and using the information for their calculations will be DECEIVED!  But although they have 38% more installed, its not working much better than a properly oriented south facing system with proper equipment.  More on that another time.

Nelson hydro's own bylaw says the maximum size of a solar system is 25kW without
special consideration from the Nelson hydro manager.

Also it states anyone's excess power will be purchased will only be purchased with the authorization of the Nelson hydro manager and if there is an economic benefit to Nelson hydro.

All of this and more I have presented to regional district directors, mayors and councilors past and present.   I also spoke in person with the Nelson hydro manager with the regional director for
Balfour present.   In my opinion the hydro manager is unethical and the director knows nothing.

The Balfour Golf Clubhouse is misrepresenting the public on line data, which no longer appears as of May2019, I have asked the regional directors involved why the data is no longer being shown, with no response.

There were two bids from Alberta solar companies to install the system, one stated in their bid
the size was limited to under 25kW to meet the Nelson hydro bylaw maximum.

The accepted bid installed 40kW of solar , exceeding the Nelson hydro bylaw maximum size!

Install price likely over $4/watt or $160,000 although its difficult to get real numbers from the available financials.

Nelson hydro pays FULL retail for their excess solar, most earned in summer when we don't need it, our dam and every one in the Pacific Northwest is filling and overflowing from spring runoff into high summer water levels when most  annual solar power is earned.

This credit is then cashed in during winter when solar is negligible and Nelson hydro is buying excess power from Fortis at 5 times the rate of their own generation.   Buy High, Sell Low.

Public grant money installs these systems, Nelson hydro customers pay full retail for this feelgood warm fuzzy feeling philosophical power while cleaner greener water that would make that power and profits spills down the river.

The same deception for the public on line data occurrs here as for the Balfour Community Hall

The Nelson hydro bylaw says no systems larger than 25kW and they won't buy anyone's power unless it makes economic sense for Nelson hydro.

How curious!  They show 24.8kW installed when actually 40 kW is installed exceeding the bylaw!

I spoke directly at a public budget meeting with the manager of Nelson Hydro Alex Love, standing beside him the regional director Ramona Faust and brought this up and asked why we were paying full retail for their excess power.   Alex Love looked at me and motioned to Ramona Faust as he said "ask her".  She said to me "you just don't like solar".  (we have had conversations and emails before).
I replied not true, I just don't like public money wasted.

I can't do this alone, nobody does anything, this is just one of many items I know about, my intention is to help with knowledge and information.   

How about someone standing up and helping?  Its your tax dollars (grants are not free money) its your Nelson hydro bill subsidizing this feelgood philosphical greenwashing wasting your money.
There will be more CBT funding for more public feelgood solar systems I can't stop anything.


Sign on to facebook page

            Nelson Talkz       

get educated  
   help us make this city accountable.  

contact mayordooley@nelson.ca
and NelsonCouncil@nelson.ca

Balfour Solar Scam Part 1

Balfour Public Grant money Solar System Scam Part 1

Below is a screenshot from the public on line data for the Balfour Community Hall solar system.

They are misrepresenting the system size anyone using this data will be fooled.

I have brought this to the attention of those and others involved more than once.

The last public news release stated 305 watt panels were installed. There are 60 making the

system 18.3kW yet they show 12.4kW installed.

Anyone using this public data (there are thousands available in the world) will be fooled.

The information shows the system cost $157,130 for 18kW or $8.72/watt almost triple

what one might expect. Presuming it was on budget.

The first year it earned 13686kWh. Nelson hydro makes that for $119 and sells for a 500% profit.

If you really do the complicated calcultions I won't go into here its worth maybe $29 at best!

Business case borrowed $157,000 is $9600/yr for 25 years.

They take our public grant money that society could use for real needs, Nelson hydro allows full retail for any of their solar credit made in summer when Nelson doesn't need their power and

they cash in that solar credit in winter when Nelson hydro is buying excess power from
Fortis for 5 times as much as their own generation. Nelson hydro loses the power sales from their cleaner greener waterpower.  Nothing is cleaner than our waterpower.  That makes solar dirty power adding to our carbon footprint.   Cradle to toxic grave if the panels last 25 years the power is never cleaner than our waterpower plus all the non renewables in mining, smelting and transportation and final toxic hazardous material end of life costs.

Lose Lose Lose, grant money better spent wasted, Nelson hydro income from cleaner water power sales lost that helps bring down our hydro rates, and its dirty power.

Greenwashing absurdity at its finest. There is part 1, more to come.

PS All the information necessary to arrive at the $29 per year valuation for this solar systems annual power requires a very in depth knowledge of when solar power has value, for example from spring runoff through high summer water reservoir/lake levels when water is spilling, solar is worthless.  We don't even use all the water.   When our water batteries become useful in winter draw down, solar power is negligible, when we could use the power.  Example,  the Duncan Lake reservoir is one of our winter batteries,  30 miles long, fills up 100 feet for 1.4Million acre feet of storage.  Similarly Libby and Kootenay lake.  Several million acre feet of water that goes through our hydro generators for six months until spring runoff refills and the cycle repeats.

Open letter to Councillor Renwick

My blog title goes back to the community solar garden there is a connection Nelson hydro customers fund that feelgood political greenwashing failure and they also been involved with NelsonFiber funding.

Re: city council  presentation (starts about 1:42) for Nelson Fiber bylaw to reduce rates to be more competitive. Council will receive new bylaw rate request June 24th.

Good day  Councillor Renwick:

I would like to offer some information re: Nelson Fibre rate reduction,to help council make good decisions, what the CAO and NF manager presented is anything but

the best information to benefit the taxpayers.

The city is biting the hand that feeds it, Telus and Shawcable pay to be on the city hydro poles, why
interfere and use public money to compete with real business?

                         Above is a Nelson hydro pole with Telus, Shaw and NF fibre.

Nelsonfibre is dark fibre, like waterpipe with no water, you have no TV, internet etc., you only

sell the pipe, the income is in the product over the long term. Your pipe is redundant.  In fact
you are just resellers of what Telus and Shaw already have, why introduce another cost into
the picture?

The NF manager stated they are in discussion with Telus and Shaw, for what? Telus and Shaw

above have the product, internet, TV, etc., They need to pay your pole rental and bring their shareholders a profit. NF is a taxpayer funded pretend business with no customers or future.

Why does NF have NO residential customers?  Its been around for years. UNAFFORDABLE

NF residential rate  $500 min install, $250 admin fee  $100/mo for city darkfibre.
Then the customer must get their own equipment and an internet and or TV service plan.

NF business rate as above and  $150/mo to the city.

I have an invoice for the Retreat Guru business for NelsonFiber.  I believe councillor
Logtenberg rents a desk there, maybe he can bring council the latest information.

The retreat Guru invoice I show paid $2291 for install, (basic $500 or costs)
$250 one time admin fee, $150/mo to the city for darkfiber.

Then they have to buy their own equipment and an internet service plan.

Telus has 1GB Business unlimited data, free install, modem etc. for $170/mo.
Shaw although slower  $139.95/mo business, free install, modem and free Shaw Go Wifi
Hotspot.
Is the Retreat Guru still an NF customer?  Will they be when Telusfiber is available
with free install, modem attractive competitive pricing we haven't seen yet.  When Telus
PureFibre went into Creston recently the promo was $49.95/mo for the first 6 months, free
install, modem, etc.

THIS IS THE IMPORTANT MESSAGE COUNCILLOR!!!!!!!!!!

When we met the other day briefly you heard my friend relate the story his wife was
solicited by Telus and she wasn't interested initially, they sweetened the deal until it
was $40/mo for 2 years.  She called Shaw to cancel they offered $38 she told them to take
a hike she had been paying them for decades, recently over $80/mo. 

When TelusPureFiber is all over the city, Shaw cable already is, they share the total city
customer business, they will price compete as above to retain market.

What will NF who have NO residential customers expect to achieve.

NF has no TV or internet, only the fiber, its Shaw or Telus who provide the value.

The city rates now $100/mo for residential(no customers) or other gov;'t.  $150/mo
for business for darkfibre, like water pipe with no water,

How will NF compete?  Why would you parallel their fiber and then expect to put their
product in it to make a profit?  Ludicrous. Absurd!

Secondly NF has no penetration, they exist in a tiny percent of the city, how many potential
customers even if you were able to get all on your availability?  See map for Fairview below!

NF doesn't have the market penetration, below in green, NF in Fairview, hardly available anywhere, Shawcable is everywhere and Telus fibre soon will be.

Will NF give me a quote for 800 block 5th st?  It would cost $50,000 to bring fiber over to me.

The last council meeting re NelsonFibre was painful to listen to. Beginning

around 1:42 .

How can the CAO and NF manager appear before council and give you their salespitch

for NF with a straight face?

The city says its saving $100,000/yr with NF. With about 4 locations(firehall, library, city hall and works yard)

The Mgr is $97K/yr, with two full time IT techs, with holidays and benefits likely $250,000/yr.

NelsonFiber income  $100/mo from schools and other gov't connections and $150 from
business.  They still need an internet plan.

The city says NF is self sustaining

Believable?  I don't believe anything from this city anymore.

Someone who knows more than I suggests NF equipments and fiber cost over $2M.

Real business costs borrowed money 3.5% interest over 25 years another $10,000/mo.

 Where are the revenue expense financials for NF?  Can't be found. 

At the last council meeting presentation from CAO and NF mgr only mayor had a question, he said to the NF mgr “would we be having this conversation if Telus wasn't coming to town?” Her reply

“YES we have been planning this for a long time this has created faster action.  Might this have something to do
with keeping her $97,000/yr income?

What was the CAO doing trying to sell council NF? he should be saying NF is a failure, bankrupt we should stop funding it.

The NF mgr. Goes on to say CBBC(Columbia Basin Broadband Corporation) is a strategic partner? How? More public CBT grant money?

So where are the questions from the rest of council?  Like deer in the headlights, rubber stamping
the CAO incompetence.  How about it councillors, ask some questions.

The CAO talks about multi unit buildings sharing a strand. Present NF pricing two sharing

$100/ea/mo. For darkfibre than they have to get equipment and a plan.

For a landlord/building owner with 5 sharing, down to $40/mo. What landlord would put this together, no need to create a bonus to attract renters, there aren't any vacancies.

The commons has fiber, not one residential customer. Just how many multi unit bldgs exist where

NF is available anyways?

ITS TIME THIS CITY MADE BUSINESS DECISIONS, NELSONFIBRE WOULD HAVE

BEEN A BANKRUPT BUSINESS LONG AGO, DON'T DISRESPECT THE TAXPAYER AND SEND ANOTHER NICKEL INTO THIS HOLE OF STUPIDITY.

I predicted this in 2016.

My blog Fibre Optic Splicing a Delicate Operation

Nelson hydro does NF work, how about the  $90,000 taken from a city reserve fund to pay for the NF  reno in city hall, or the  $20,000 security door?

The Community Charter says reserve funds must be spent for the purpose created, any other

use must be repaid with interest, how will NF repay this?

Will schools continue as NF customers? The Ministry of Ed. Contracts to Telus for their NextGen Network (high speed fiber) in the rest of the province. Is NF the carrier of this product here? Now with Telusfibre at every school why would they stay with NF?

Will NF retain their other government customers?  

NF is a stranded asset (liability?) no future, no reason to exist.

NelsonFiber is a stranded asset, an unfortunate waste of public grant and taxpayers money.

NF makes the solar garden waste look like a walk in the park.

Will they keep paying the NF manager and staff with nothing to do?

June 24th lets see what the CAO and NF manager bring to city council for their 
new competitive rate bylaw.   NF would have been bankrupt long ago if it was
a real business.

Norm Yanke

Nelson

PS the above example $40/mo for 2year contract was not fibre but conventional internet
speeds, all that most need, something supports emails and NetFlix video and YouTube.

Also when you are a reseller of internet who will your customer call when there is a problem
will NF have a hotline, support?   Will DHC who have gotten rich over NF be sending
bills to the city for all the trouble calls?  Telus and Shaw absorb this from their profits.
 Another reason NF has no reason to exist.
Even now schools have their own IT people, are city IT people servicing their business clients
Somewhere between 30 and 50 since the info is unavailable.   NF is done, over, finished
bankrupt don't waste another nickel.

2019 Nelson Hydro Ignores its own Bylaws, RDCK fails due diligence in public spending

Comment submission Re: Nelson hydro 2019 Rate review

Nelson hydro ignores its own bylaw(rates paid for solar only if there is economic benefit to Nelson Hydro) and Public information for the Balfour community solar.  (Systems cannot be larger than 25kW) both Balfour systems exceed this!
Grant money was supposed to be spent for projects that showed a positive return.  Alberta
Pembina institute  came up with that one.  RDCK did no due diligence to confirm.
Their statement "the two bidders calculations aren't similar! and how they did their calculations
is unknown! _should be a RED FLAG.


All of this I submitted to the last mayor and council, again to  this mayor and council, the Regional District and director involved and the Alberta installation company.

NOTHING has changed or been discussed with me.  And more grant money is coming likely
to produce the same result and loss to Nelson hydro ratepayers.


My concern is Columbia Basin Trust's recent announcement of $900,000 grant money available for community alternate energy systems.  We already have systems in the Nelson hydro service area from previous grants.  In 2009 a SolarBC grant put a system on the high school.  Around 2011 a local business received a grant for a solar system.  The business and solar system disappeared.  One of the city councillors was a principal in that business.  He has yet to reveal what happened to the system paid for with public money.
There is a solar system from grant money on a city park washroom.  The Nelson Community Solar
Garden, Nelson hydro pays full retail for that power when the alternative is huge profits from wholesale cleaner greener waterpower, now spilling down the river with the profits

Last summer grant money installed three solar systems with grant money on community buildings in Nelson hydro's service area at Balfour, Regional District.  Nelson hydro is paying full retail for any of their excess solar power while losing income from waterpower sales.  Its unknown how many more systems might show up with the recent $900,000 CBT grant money.

Every kW of solar in the Nelson hydro service area is lost hydro income that helps reduce rates.

Nelson hydro is not abiding by its own bylaw.

Nelson hydro bylaw   6.4 Net Metering Interconnection Requirements

States Rates paid will be subject to the approval of the Nelson hydro General Manager and will be determined based on the economic benefit to Nelson Hydro.

It also states maximum projects size is 25kW .

The Balfour systems don't meet bylaw, they should never have been approved, never mind
exceeding the maximum size!

 The Balfour systems exceed 25kW.



At the recent public hydro budget meeting the Area director for Balfour and the manager of Nelson hydro were together and I approached them.  I asked the hydro manager how much Balfour was being paid for  their excess solar power.  His reply,  motioning towards the area director, "ask her".    She didn't know.   I then asked why the systems exceed the 25kW bylaw maximum power.  He acted like he didn't know what I was talking about.  I had a printout of the bylaw in my hand.  Trying to show him, he put his hand up towards me, signalling the conversation was over.

The CBT grant requires one must show a positive return for the project.  Balfour's report was prepared by the Pembina Institute of Edmonton.  With no engineering data collected on site, their estimate of annual power exceeded any known local data and now that its been in operation for over 7 months data shows they are earning less than 70% of estimates.

The report makes a deceptive statement as follows:

A way for Nelson Hydro to avoid purchasing
electricity from other utilities (FortisBC) is to purchase renewable, low-carbon

electricity locally

Nelson hydro makes a large profit selling low-carbon waterpower, nothing is greener or
cleaner than waterpower.

The RDCK makes the statement

 the systems must be economical to ensure public dollars are being spent prudently. This analysis uses the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) metric.

IRR ignores all expenses, Warren Buffet calls it Bull$hit bookkeeping, to take public grant
money this way is anything but prudent.

The RDCK statement in the report as follows:\

 Each company provided an Internal Rate of Return (IRR) calculation, but the details of how each company performed the calculation is unknown. It is suspected the calculations are not similar and may or may not include levelized operation and maintenance costs. Regardless, the IRR calculations give good guidance to the economics of the system. Cost savings does not take into account operating, maintenance and replacement costs. They are strictly savings on electricity bills.

In my opinion referring to the above statement, there was no due diligence by the RDCK to confirm whether the projects were economical to  ensure public dollars are being spent prudently.  No bank would loan money with this lack of due diligence or non engineering, yet grants were given.

FURTHER DECEPTION

The public on line data shows the following deceptive information

 public data for the  Balfour Community Hall

Balfour Community Hall PV System Overview

PV System Data

aCurrent PV Power

41 minutes ago

3040 W

PV Energy

67.26 kWh
Today

Total: 5522.17 kWh

CO2 avoided

47 kg
Today

Total: 3.9 t

PV system information

PV system power:

12.40 kWp

Commissioning:

7/31/2018

Note above it shows 12.4kWp installed. They have 18.4kW installed!!!  This fools anyone using this data into thinking the system makes far more power per kw of solar panel than it really is! 

They have 18.3kWp installed, anyone looking at the on line data will be fooled into thinking
the system is making far more power than it is.

Above are 60 305 watt panels on the Balfour community hall making 18.3kW installed.


THE BALFOUR GOLF CLUB HOUSE SYSTEM DECEPTIVE

The on line public data similarly is deceptive, showing 24.8kW installed when over 40kW is installed.  Deceiving anyone looking at the on line data into thinking the system is making far more power than it is.

Balfour Golf Course PV System Overview

PV System Data

Current PV Power

-

PV Energy

11.429 MWh
Total

CO2 avoided

8.0 t
Total

PV system information

PV system power:

24.80 kWp

Commissioning:

7/31/2018

Anyone viewing their on line public data will be fooled, their info shows the power made from the 40kW installed, they are only showing 24.8kWp  installed, this meets the Nelson hydro bylaw maximum of 25kW installed per site.

                          Above birds eye view of the Balfour Golf Clubhouse solar system

There are 132 305 watt solar panels = 40.3kWp installed, they show 24.8kW installed.


All of this information I have sent to the Columbia Basin Trust grantors, the RDCK directors, the city of Nelson council and Nelson hydro manager.

This was also sent to the installation company Dandelion Renewables in Alberta who would have set up the on line data, they would be the ones to correct everything.  Nothing changed.

The Balfour Golf Clubhouse on line data stopped updating in 
mid December.  Wouldn't look good when no power is made while the system is covered in snow.

I have contacted the RDCK director responsible and the installation company.  The director emailed me saying she would look into it.  At the public meeting I asked her about it in person, she had nothing to say.

Its my contention this type of deception is responsible for the new CBT grant funding of
$900,000 becoming available.

These systems and the IRR method of calculating payback deceives one into thinking solar
has value.

The BCUC denied the Fortis Kelowna solar garden project stating it had no benefit to anyone.
BC Hydro's application to no longer pay for any excess IPP power is in abeyance.
Fortis only pays their wholesale power production costs for any excess power.

And both BC Hydro and Fortis only allow one to size a system to meet their annual needs.

Nelson hydro remains as the only utility I know of that is paying full retail for any IPP power at the expense of ratepayers and  the waste of public grant monies.

In Summary:

Nelson hydro ignores its own bylaws.
1. the bylaw says it will only purchase power if its of economic benefit to Nelson hydro
2. maximum sized systems 25kW without special permissions.
The Balfour systems are on two buildings, both exceeding the 25kW maximum.

Apparently more are being planned.
Nelson hydro already scammed us with the phoney solar garden engineering.

Respectfully
Norm Yanke
Nelson BC

VOLTAGE OPTIMIZATION

                     GETTING TO 100% RENEWABLES QUICKER


    A past Nelson Hydro engineer spoke about Voltage Optimization at a public
hydro budget meeting a couple years ago.   We haven't heard about it since.

This could save a lot of energy, thus getting this city to its goal of 100% renewable
by having far more cheap electricity available.


The concept is similar to your home water pressure regulator.  In Nelson city water pressure
can be and is higher than what you want inside your home.  Typical home water pressure
regulators are set for about 60 psi.   City water pressure on the inlet side at my home is over 80 psi it can be much higher at times.   This could cause leaks in your plumbing, that is why you have a water pressure regulator.

These devices require no attention they just keep working year after year reliably.

The same concept can be applied to Electricity.

At the moment  I am seeing 128.7 vac, at my electric outlets, I have seen 130vac and higher.

Let me show you basic electric principles and ohm's law.

You have likely seen nameplates on electric appliances such as below

Here is how Voltage Optimization can work.
Using ohm's law if Voltage is maintained at 110V in a linear device. (resistance remains the same current increases with voltage, therefore power used).

Solve for Resistance above we get 12 ohms.
Current is E/R or 110V/12 ohms = 9.16 amps
Power is I x E or 9.16 amps x 110V = 1000 Watts or 1kW

What happens if the voltage is 130V?

Using ohm's law you will arrive at 1.4kW,   40% more power.

Sounds too good to be true, it violates one of the basic laws of physics: conservation of energy.

Well yes that is true for the most part.  But putting a brick in the toilet tank that saves a litre per flush over a million toilets is a million litres of water saved.   Will you notice if the lights aren't quite as bright, the tv and computer and everything else will still work.

 A study done by Intel Corporation(most computers main processor IC comes from Intel) found a 9% reduction in voltage on their microprocessors saved 20% in power consumption.

Check out these case studies from dozens of companies.  Most of this coming from Europe where electricity is costly.

Over 10.5% energy savings for the RAF.

These are using on site power optimizers, what if Nelson hydro did this?  What happened to the study the engineer was speaking about a couple years ago?

Although most of the information is talking about devices in individual homes, what if Nelson hydro did this, optimization at their level would translate into stable lower voltages in your home.


The cheapest power made is the power conserved.

Could Nelson hydro reduce power consumption by 20% how about just 10%?.

Their annual total power load is approaching 200,000MWh per year.

Saving 20MWh/year would be the equivalent of powering almost 2000 average homes.

Nelson hydro buys $6M in excess power from Fortis annually.

How many electric vehicles could use that energy.

A Nissan leaf uses 20.13kWh/100 km.

20MWh/20kWh =1000 x 100km = 100,000km.

Using too much voltage might be adding an unnecessary 10–20 percent to your electricity bill; multiply that across the whole of the industrial world and you get a big problem that's bad for the economy and bad for the planet.

save up to 26% on your electric bills

technology is demonstrated and proven

the national grid case study

How it works

I think I will call Nelson hydro and get them to turn the voltage down in my house
its reading just under 130 volts, I would like to see 110 volts.

Thats only a 15% voltage change but it gives almost 40% reduction in power, see calculations above.
Would you like to see your hydro bill reduced by 40%?